Reinvention Center  
 
 

Our Goals
Who We Are
Events
Resources
Spotlight
Reinventions
Boyer Report
Brochure
Networks
Studies

Home

 
Boyer Report
 
  Stony Brook Logo  
  Contact us Join our network Level up  

Conference Proceedings
Index of Speakers and Session Leaders
Biographical Statements

  Transforming the Culture: Undergraduate Education and the
Multiple Functions of the Research University
 


Humanities Postdoctoral Teaching Fellowships in Undergraduate Education

Leader: Ellen Woods, Associate Director of the Introduction to the Humanities Program and Associate Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education, Stanford University

Recorder: Robert C. Jones, Teaching Fellow, Introduction to the Humanities Program, Stanford University

 

 

Presentation:

Introduction to Humanities

Dr. Woods began the session by asking all those present to explain the reasons and motivations for their attending this particular session. Although the responses revealed a wide range of interests, the common theme expressed by most in attendance was a desire to successfully implement (or improve an existing) undergraduate-teaching-focused postdoctoral program in writing and the humanities at their respective institutions.

Dr. Woods explained how the first-year curriculum at Stanford is, in many ways, intended to be an integrated introduction to the possibility of undergraduates becoming research partners with faculty throughout their four years at Stanford. The Introduction to the Humanities Program (IHUM) at Stanford is one of three programs offered to Stanford freshman intended to achieve this goal. The IHUM Program at Stanford was set up specifically as an interdisciplinary, team-taught program with the intention (among other things) of disabusing freshman of the notion that there exists one single authority who will provide them with the “right answers.” The idea in IHUM is to model for students the interrogation of texts from an interdisciplinary perspective in an effort to engage students as “beginning partners in research” as they move through their undergraduate careers, nurturing a sense of critical inquiry, independent questioning, and the development of their own “voice of authority” in the introductory core curriculum. The two other components of this integrated freshman program include the Program in Writing and Rhetoric, a program that emphasizes research-based writing skills and which complements the core curriculum, and the Introductory Seminars Program consisting of undergraduate seminars, taught by (and centered around the research of) senior faculty, intended to cultivate mentoring relationships between faculty and undergraduates.

The IHUM Program’s postdoctoral fellowships differ somewhat from traditional postdoctoral fellowships in the humanities. Postdoctoral fellowships in the humanities have traditionally included either (a) programs at liberal arts colleges, or (b) Mellon Foundation-sponsored research fellowships at research universities.

Figure 1

From its inception, the IHUM Program—created in 1987 as part of the Stanford Undergraduate General Education Core Requirement—specified the integration of postdoctoral teachers. The utilization of postdoctoral teaching fellows was seen as the most effective way to carry out and achieve the goals of Stanford’s freshman core curriculum.

Figure 2:

The IHUM freshman core curriculum—required of all 1600 incoming freshman—is a full-year (i.e., three-academic-quarter) curriculum. The fall quarter offers a ten-week, interdisciplinary, team-taught course chosen by the student from a field of eight to ten course offerings. The winter and spring quarters provide an integrated two-quarter (twenty week) sequence with a disciplinary focus. In its search for postdoctoral teaching fellows, the IHUM Program looks for individuals who are scholars in their respective fields, have demonstrated the abilities to effectively teach freshman, teach in teams, and work across disciplines outside their areas of specialization. The courses are designed by members of the senior faculty and reviewed and vetted by the IHUM Governance Board. IHUM employs 34-36 postdoctoral fellows, each on three-year terms, about one-third of whom are replaced each year.

Figure 3:

One reason that the IHUM postdoctoral fellows are indispensable to the mission of the IHUM Program is that the curriculum, rather than being text-focused, is focused on the development of the students’ skills in relation to inquiry, oral presentation, writing, and the “big questions” in the humanities that affect students on both the personal and intellectual levels. Though students attend the faculty lectures two hours a week, the predominant mode of instruction in the IHUM Program are the seminars—led by an experienced postdoctoral teaching fellow—that meet three hours per week. The topics studied over the course of the year often focus on controversial questions surrounding issues of race, religion, moral development, etc.—all of which are encouraged by the governance board. But, such topics require experienced postdoctoral teaching fellows.

The national search for the IHUM postdoctoral fellowship is very competitive. In the last two years, the IHUM Program has received over 700 applications for the fifteen available positions. Both the IHUM administration and the senior faculty who design and teach the courses review the applications. This allows the faculty to get good matches for the courses across disciplines. Once the quarters begin, the faculty who teach and design the courses meet weekly with the postdoctoral teaching teams to discuss the progress of the course and exchange ideas regarding things such as pedagogical strategies, the effectiveness of materials chosen for the course, etc.

Figure 4:

Dr. Woods considers the IHUM postdoctoral program a training program. The IHUM orientation training, which Dr. Woods sees as both an educational experience and an investment in the professional careers of the “transitional scholars” from the graduate level to their first professional assistant professor job, is centered on discovering exactly who the freshmen are, where they come from, and what issues they bring to a freshman humanities requirement. For example, twenty to twenty-five percent of Stanford freshman end up with degrees in engineering, a high percentage indeed. Also, Stanford has an internationally recognized and highly competitive intercollegiate athletics program. This means that these recruited athletes, many of whom are bound for professional athletics, are also found in classes. These student-athletes have a tremendous time pressure and so the IHUM Program assigns them schedules that do not conflict with their athletic schedules. Issues such as these are the subject of IHUM training in an effort to insure that the postdoctoral teaching fellows gain sensitivity to the circumstances surrounding freshman within the environment particular to Stanford.

Since the teaching fellows are the ones who see freshman more than most other instructors or advisers, the fellows are more likely than others to identify early on problems that a student may have. The central infrastructure of IHUM provides a resource for teaching fellows to communicate concerns they might have regarding potential problems with a particular freshman, in an effort toward early intervention. IHUM teaching fellows are also trained in working successfully in teams, in grade-norming within teams, and are exposed to some of the possible pitfalls they may encounter in teaching outside of their particular areas of specialization. In addition, the IHUM Program offers administrative opportunities that also act as professional development. For example, each course has both a Course Coordinator and a Technical Coordinator—both paid administrative positions—that insure that each course runs as smoothly as possible.

Figure 5:

The IHUM Program has three primary benefits for undergraduate education at Stanford. One benefit is that the IHUM Program offers proven teaching expertise to work with freshman rather than less-experienced graduate students. A few years into the creation of the IHUM Program, a second, unforeseen benefit emerged: that the teaching fellows could act as a resource in identifying potential at-risk students early in their freshman year. Third, after their first year of the fellowship, a number of the IHUM teaching fellows take advantage of the opportunity to make contributions to the academic advising of freshman.


Figure 6:

One concern facing the IHUM administration is that of job placement for its teaching fellows. How can we further support postdoctoral teaching fellows so that they can go on to secure academic jobs? After some analyses, the program has discovered that the teaching fellows have quite a successful placement record with larger, public universities. This appears to be due to the fact that the teaching demands placed upon fellows in the IHUM Program are very much in-line with what assistant professors face in the larger, teaching-centered public universities, thus making the IHUM postdoctoral teaching fellow an attractive and more competitive candidate in these markets.

Though highly trained and skilled teachers, the IHUM teaching fellows are also young scholars. Thus, a second challenge facing IHUM fellows is that of gaining professional development beyond teaching. In an effort to promote this development, the IHUM Program nurtures—both formally and informally—connections between teaching fellows and faculty members outside of the teaching team. This is particularly beneficial given the nature of Stanford as a premiere research university. Nurturing the connections includes funding (from an outside foundation) for a research leave quarter offered to teaching fellows one quarter in each of their second and third years of the fellowships. Thus, the IHUM teaching fellowship is characterized neither as solely a teaching fellowship nor a research fellowship, but rather as a hybrid postdoctoral fellowship with an emphasis on teaching.

Teaching Fellow Experiences

Dr. Jones started his presentation by addressing the question of how, in the face of the teaching demands of the IHUM fellowship, the fellowship contributes to the professional development of young scholars in the humanities. He pointed out that despite the somewhat teaching-heavy nature of the IHUM fellowship, by taking advantage of the funded research leave quarters, he was able to accomplish quite a bit in the way of research during his time as an IHUM teaching fellow. The hybrid nature of the fellowship definitely has advantages for young scholars who seek the opportunity to gain invaluable teaching experience while keeping their feet in the research waters. Also, the IHUM Program supports its fellows with funding for professional development. These monies can be used for a wide range of activities including professional association dues, the purchase of research materials, the deferral of the costs of attending professional conferences, etc. Further, the IHUM Program also helps fund the costs of the mailing of professional dossiers during job-hunting season. In addition, the University provides reimbursement to all regular staff for training activities related directly to career development through their Staff Training Assistance Program (STAP). There are a number of professional advantages to having access to top researchers at Stanford, and the IHUM Program fosters these relationships and professional connections between IHUM fellows and senior faculty. Further, all of the teaching fellows have the opportunity to present their research at an annual conference of IHUM fellows in which those fellows returning from research leave get the chance to share their research in a scholarly forum, further nurturing the professional aspects of the teaching fellows’ experiences within the IHUM Program in preparation for professional “job talks”.

For early-career scholars in the humanities it is important to have an exemplary teaching portfolio when going on the academic job market. IHUM fellows receive significant support in this area through the many resources available to them through the both the IHUM Program itself and through the University’s Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) and Career Development Center. In addition, the experience the fellows gain from the intensity of team teaching and from leading student-focused seminars three hours per week provides IHUM fellows with valuable, hands-on teaching experience, making them that much more attractive to potential employers in the academic job market.

Fellows receive a number of benefits from being a part of a large, multi-disciplinary fellowship group. Working closely with colleagues from other disciplines broadens fellows’ understanding of the humanities, and exposes them to new works of literature, history, and art. Teaching in such an interdisciplinary setting enhances the ability to teach interdisciplinary courses and makes fellows more attractive on the academic job market. The team-teaching format provided by the IHUM fellowship also provides an opportunity to cultivate important people skills through working closely with colleagues on a common pedagogical purpose.

Dr. Jones concluded his portion of the presentation by addressing the question of what special qualities, from the perspective of undergraduate education, the postdoctoral fellow brings to the general education classroom. IHUM fellows act as models and sometimes mentors to young future scholars, and serve as bridges between the accomplished senior faculty and the fledgling students.

Discussion:

Much of the discussion focused on fiscal concerns. It was disclosed that the cost of IHUM fellows’ salaries was around $45,000 (plus benefits) per fellow. Aside from a financial incentive for new courses, faculty participating in the IHUM Program are paid though their respective departments’ budgets. The budgetary demands of such a hybrid program were discussed and it was acknowledged that the funding for such programs is somewhat difficult to secure, even at such a high-powered research university as Stanford. The importance of the health benefits provided IHUM fellows (as University employees) was also discussed, and Dr. Woods pointed out how these health benefits are often the first full-coverage health benefits the fellows have ever received, an important fact given that many IHUM fellows come to this postdoctoral fellowship during their child-bearing years. Thus, the IHUM postdoctoral fellowship can be seen as a way for the fellows to start both a career and a family. The discussion continued about further budgetary specifics and it was disclosed that the fellows receive $800 annually for professional development, up to $100 towards the costs of the mailing of professional dossiers during job-hunting season, and $800 in STAP funding.

Though mandatory classes in theories of learning and pedagogy are not a formal part of the IHUM fellows’ training, the fellows are required to attend a formal two-week IHUM training seminar that covers various salient aspects of the IHUM teaching experience. Also, fellows are encouraged to participate in numerous seminars provided weekly by the CTL. IHUM fellows are also required to attend meetings with their teaching teams, held at the beginning of each quarter, in which they discuss issues and potential challenges specific to their particular courses.

It was made clear that the CTL provides numerous seminars directed at the preparation of teaching dossiers including seminars on how to prepare teaching statements, curriculum vitas, etc. As to the issue of whether the IHUM Program requires teaching portfolio preparation for the job market, Dr. Woods pointed out that since the demands of each discipline (with regard to the job market) are so varied, the IHUM program cannot reasonably take on this responsibility administratively, but instead encourages the fellows to prepare their teaching dossiers on their own. The IHUM Program does, however, facilitate dossier preparation by offering numerous seminars focused on the preparation of the dossier under the guidance of the folks at the CTL.

It was noted that though the design and content of each course is dictated by the faculty in conjunction with the IHUM Governance Board, the approach to course materials is determined largely by the background, professional and personal experience, and expertise that each individual teaching fellow brings to his or her particular course via the seminars. This gives the teaching fellows a unique level autonomy not usually found in the graduate teaching assistant experience. It was further noted that the role of the faculty members in mentoring the teaching fellows through weekly meetings acts as a sort of unspoken professional development that is far more valuable than the faculty/grad assistant relationship.

The nature and demands of the individual IHUM courses dictate which fellows from which backgrounds will be hired into the program. Current courses offered in the IHUM Program include classics, English, French, Italian, religious studies, and philosophy, among others. In their initial online applications to the fellowship hiring committee, the teaching fellows are required to list a number of courses they feel that they are qualified to teach. This allows IHUM administrators and faculty to assess the applicants’ qualifications and match the proper number of teaching fellows from various disciplines with the appropriate courses offered in the IHUM Program. As to the level of teaching experience of the incoming teaching fellows, it was explained that most of the IHUM fellows have extensive experience as graduate teaching assistants, though many have experience in teaching their own classes in writing programs and core interdisciplinary general education courses at various colleges and universities.

There are numerous opportunities for the students to interact with the faulty members one-on-one. These opportunities include meetings in faculty office hours, course social events, movie nights, pizza parties, teas, etc. However, since most IHUM students do not go on to become humanities majors, most faculty members do not end up working in a research-mentoring relationship with the typical IHUM student. However, for those students who do go on in the humanities, there is quite often a strong and early research relationship made, a connection encouraged by the IHUM administration, the teaching fellows, and the faculty members themselves.

References/Resources:

Websites

  1. Stanford University Introduction to the Humanities Program (IHUM): http://www.stanford.edu/dept/undergrad/ihum
  2. Stanford University Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL):
    http://www.stanford.edu/dept/CTL
  3. Stanford University Career Development Center:
    http://cardinalcareers.stanford.edu/default.htm
  4. Stanford University Homepage:
    http://www.stanford.edu