Reinvention Center  
 
 

Our Goals
Who We Are
Events
Resources
Spotlight
Reinventions
Boyer Report
Brochure
Networks
Studies

Home

 
Boyer Report
 
  Stony Brook Logo  
  Contact us Join our network Level up  

Conference Proceedings
Index of Speakers and Session Leaders
Biographical Statements

  Transforming the Culture: Undergraduate Education and the
Multiple Functions of the Research University
 


Building Undergraduate Research Partnerships: Engaging Education, Government and Industry

Powerpoint Presentation

Leaders: George Barthalmus, Director, of the Office of Undergraduate Research and Professor of Zoology, North Carolina State University, and Coordinator of the State of North Carolina Undergraduate Research and Creativity Symposium; and Jennifer Klimas, Research Director, University of North Carolina-General Administration, Office of Research

Recorder: Samara Burnette, Doctoral Student in Educational Leadership, Research, and Policy Studies, North Carolina State University

 

Presentation:

There is growing national attention on the importance and potential of undergraduate research opportunities to enhance the undergraduate educational experience. In North Carolina, a variety of activities and collaborations are underway to promote undergraduate research opportunities at all of the institutions of higher education. The state is very diverse geographically and economically, with 111 educational institutions serving all 100 counties. Like many states, in recent years there has been a shift from a manufacturing and agriculturally-based economy to a more knowledge-based economy. This presents a challenge to educational institutions, which must meet the demands of this new economy with graduates who are prepared to participate in the workforce and provide future leadership. One approach to addressing this issue in North Carolina is bringing together partners from institutions of higher education, government, and industry to broadly support initiatives such as undergraduate research.

Background

In 2001 the University of North Carolina General Administration formed the UNC Undergraduate Research Consortium (UNC-URC), which brought together representatives from all sixteen campuses of the UNC system to share best practices in promoting undergraduate research and to pool the scarce resources available in this arena. See Website: http://www.northcarolina.edu/content.php/aa/departments/research/initiatives/urc.htm
The representatives included both administrators and faculty from an array of disciplines, all of whom brought their institution’s unique assets and perspective to the discussion. Their perspectives were reflective of the composition of the institution’s student body (eg, PUIs vs R1) and the distinct regions of the state that they serve (eg, rural, urban).

The first challenge of the UNC-URC was to define “undergraduate research” in a way that was inclusive of all fields of study and all levels of undergraduate education. The inclusion of the arts and humanities, as well as an emphasis on the key role of mentoring, was particularly important. UNC-URC members wanted mentors involved and recognized for the work they did in shaping undergraduate experiences. They also wanted to be careful with unqualified use of the term “research,” which many see as too narrow to recognize the creativity that takes place in all disciplines. This has been an on-going challenge, but the group has adopted the following definition:

Investigation, scholarship, experimentation, or creative work in any field of study, carried out independently or in small teams and assisted by faculty or other mentors.

In its first five years, the Consortium has initiated a number of activities and events. The group meets quarterly via videoconferences and holds an annual workshop to share best practices. The videoconferences allow participation by representatives from all institutions, as the state spans more than 500 miles east to west. The additional in-person meeting is important as a means of keeping in contact, given some of the technical challenges to communicating in a videoconference setting (delay, reception, sounds quality, etc.). UNC-URC discussions center around identifying priorities and challenges, vetting common issues, and determining future directions.

The initial event of the UNC-URC was the 2001 Research in the Capital Symposium. Now a biennial event, the Symposium brings 100 UNC undergraduate student researchers to Raleigh, the state capital, to showcase their research and meet with legislators. This event, which gives visibility to the quality scholarship of our undergraduates, has been extremely successful. Additionally, many of the students have never been to the Capital, so this in itself is a positive experience. Event coordinators put much effort into matching students to legislators from their home district, and the students visit each legislator in their office that morning to deliver an abstract book and to invite them to the event. Several students are also introduced on the floor of the legislative building the night before the Symposium as a way of reminding legislators to attend. Legislators often comment that this event is a rare time when constituents come to them not asking for money and the UNC-URC is careful to foster this event as a positive, one-on-one interaction.

In 2003, the UNC-URC decided to pursue funding under the newly established National Science Foundation (NSF) Undergraduate Research Center program. The RFP cited interest in creating large-scale centers that would bring students into undergraduate research early in their undergraduate years. Though its application was not successful, the Consortium was successful in stimulating the formation of new and lasting partnerships. Throughout the proposal preparation process, the UNC institutions solidified their common goals and identified external partners from other institutions of higher education, including NC Community Colleges, and industry. When the grant was not funded, UNC-URC members determined that they were nevertheless well positioned to go forward with the partnership and plans outlined in the proposal. The group has since focused on crafting an agenda of priorities and pursuing appropriate potential funding (rather than allowing the funding “carrot” to influence the group’s priorities).

Current Activities

In 2005, the first State of North Carolina Undergraduate Research and Creativity Symposium (SNCURCS) was held at NC State University in Raleigh. The event showcased students not only from UNC campuses, but also from all 111 institutions of higher education across the state. This one-day symposium enabled the next generation of scholars and knowledge builders to showcase their talent.

In its first year (November 12, 2005), the SNCURCS featured 218 oral, poster, and visual and performing art presentations that included three from business areas, 171 from science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) areas, 12 from the performing and visual arts, 32 within the social sciences, and 39 mentoring affiliations. There were seven 50-minute lunchbox sessions that helped position students for (1) admission to graduate and professional schools, (2) national fellowships, (3) understanding patents and property rights, (4) considerations of women to enter STEM careers, and (5) activities related to the new statewide undergraduate research journal, EXPLORATIONS. National fellows, advisers, community lawyers, deans, and undergraduate students led these sessions. The second SNCURCS was on November 18, 2006; details about the event are provided at: http://www.ncsu.edu/sncurcs

The poster sessions included only STEM presenters (78% of all Symposium participants) while ten concurrent sessions consisted of five oral presentations per room presented by students in the social science, humanities, business, and the visual and performing arts. Eighty-seven high school teachers and students from predominately black schools were invited to attend the Symposium and a subsequent workshop at the NC Museum of Natural Sciences. The goal was to introduce the teachers and students to a breadth of research and scholarship possibilities and provide an opportunity for them to ask questions of the student researchers and scientists.

The Symposium in now an annual event that has broad support and receives significant funding from UNC System President Erskine Bowles, as well as from 26 other sponsors and grantors. Industry and governmental sponsors recognize that the undergraduate researchers and creative artists who participate in the Symposium are the talent needed for the State’s future. The event attracts recruiters from graduate and professional schools, North Carolina government agencies, corporations and small businesses, as well as from participating universities. By attending the Symposium they are able to truly "see these students in action."

Suggestions/Lessons Learned from SNCURCS

  • Writing grants, in addition to contacting potential corporate and government sponsors, is critical to attracting funding and building partnerships. As corporations are inundated with various funding requests, it is best to ask many for a little money ($300-$1,000) than a few for much more. Remember: “The chickens get to eat while the hogs go to slaughter.” Also, indicate that the donors’ ’ logo and company/agency name will be featured on your Web site and in publications and that the dollar amount they provide will not be advertised. Thus the pressure to provide large sums in removed. This works! Use your early but largest sponsors as leverage to gain smaller gifts. The SNCURCS for November 2006 raised $80,000 for its one-day event.
  • The SNCURCS coordinator wrote grants to the (1) NC Biotechnology Center, (2) NC Sea Grant, (3) NC Space Grant, (4) NC Board of Science and Technology, (5) NC Department of the Secretary of State, (6) Kenan Institute for Engineering, Technology and Science, (5) Duke University’s Howard Hughes Medical Institute Grant, and (6) the Burroughs Wellcome Fund that supported the high school visitations. Funding came from a variety of other sources, such as the national and campus Chapters of Phi Kappa Phi, NC State’s Chapter of Sigma Xi, several industry partners within the Research Triangle area, and many of the participating colleges and universities attending the symposium.
  • The Symposium offers employers and post-baccalaureate schools an opportunity to meet and recruit talented students who bring hands-on experience to the workplace. Emphasize this workforce/economic development aspect of the event in every grant application, welcome letter, abstract, and flyer. Also realize that some of these recruiters may even volunteer to provide sponsorship dollars.
  • Go where the interest is. Seek it out. Sigma Xi is very interested right now in this effort and we are hoping to use North Carolina as a model for the other 49 states.
  • Forge partnerships in not-so-obvious places. The SNCURCS has formed alliances with caterers, printers, publishers, and small businesses that were willing to give discount services to the Symposium’s general costs or to the participants (a store for dancers provided a 15% discount to any participant).
  • Find those government agencies whose mission is to cultivate future economic development. They may surprise you with their interest and support. If not money, they may be able to provide contacts, mailing lists and other information to help you bridge partnerships. The NC Museum of Natural Sciences hosted the entire high school teacher program this year at its Prairie Ridge Outdoor Teaching Laboratory. Teachers arrived with coats and boots and were prepared to collect data out in the field and to develop journals. This program complemented the Symposium by helping the teachers to find ways that they could incorporate research-based learning opportunities into their English and science classrooms.
  • Involve the community college system. The central office of a consolidated system may be able to assist in getting the word out. Early undergraduate research experiences can be critical to bridging students from community colleges to four-year institutions and allowing them to smoothly transition onto research projects.

Discussion:

The discussion was organized around several issues that are central to SNCURCS and to engaging undergraduates in research.

Increasing involvement of students from non-experimental social sciences, humanities, business, and the arts in research/creative projects. Scholarly work across disciplines varies greatly, as do opportunities to engage students and showcase their work. Within the arts, for example, it is particularly difficult to attract students to the SNCURCS since they have many other outlets for their work. Moreover, even in disciplines that have a tradition of undergraduate research, some faculty do not see the local or campus research symposium as the best venue for their students, but prefer instead that the student attendance and participation at national or regional disciplinary meetings. One university has its performing arts students give presentations after poster sessions. Other institutions use their distinguished faculty awards day to showcase their performing artists. The SNCURCS features some of its performing artists at the beginning of the Symposium for all to see. These students show the science and structure of their music or choreography. The intent is to show all the STEM participants that research takes many forms across disciplinary lines. Session participants indicated that research in the humanities is often one-on-one and is usually not done in the summer, when humanities faculty are frequently away.

Quality control of research abstracts and journal articles. The SNCURCS started an Undergraduate Research Journal, EXPLORATIONS, that was funded by Symposium sponsors this year and organized and published by East Carolina University. In an effort to maintain quality control while easing the responsibility for editing submitted papers, EXPLORATIONS plans to publish photograph and short biographies of the student and the mentor, along with the paper; the assumption is that mentors will not wants their pictures associated in a book with an abstract or article that is not excellent. To ensure the quality of the Symposia abstracts, SNCURUS requires that --as with many other symposia-- the abstracts be approved by the student’s research mentor. There was some discussion about whether graduate students should be permitted to mentor undergraduates in research. While some institutions do not allow graduate students to serve as mentors, it was generally agreed that these opportunities are important because graduate students represent the next generation of mentors.

Student/mentor funding for campus research. At NC State University funding for about 100 students is available through a competition in which the students’ proposals are evaluated by reviewers from all participating institutions. The students’ grants range from $500 to $1000; they can be used in the spring and/or summer periods as stipends. The research mentors are given up to $300 to help cover defray operating costs relating to their mentorship. All students who receive grants must give a presentation on their work at the campus symposia or at a disciplinary meeting before they graduate.

Annual report metrics for SNCURCS. Reports must be submitted to all grantors and sponsors. Although some are identical (usually with corporate sponsors) many are unique because of the stipulations regarding the way funds were to be spent. For the 2006 Symposium, 28 reports will be prepared, including: (a) attendance numbers by school, disciplinary participation, gender and race; (b) mentoring institutions with some outside of North Carolina; (c) a copy of the book of abstracts and the first issue of EXPLORATIONS, the new journal.

Judging. There is no judging for the SNCURCS. Early input indicated that community college students (first and second year students) should not have to compete with seniors from four-year institutions. The honor of participation itself is viewed as the reward. If institutions do judge presentations, is feedback provided? Presentations at NC State University’s own symposia are judged by discipline. Should there be awards for best mentors? At one institution this award is dependent on the caliber of the student nomination. If a student writes well, then that mentor will rise above others. Another institution’s mentor award is done within the college.

Poster presentations or oral presentations? Should symposia have poster presentations, oral presentations, or both? Poster presentations give the student multiple opportunities to go through their work and to be interrupted with questions; time is not an issue. Oral presentations represent a one-time opportunity, usually of no more than 20-minute duration. In addition, often only give presentations can be given in a two-hour session. Poster sessions are dynamic and intellectually social by nature. Further, a poster presentation usually arises out of Power Point slides that can be easily pieced together for the poster or taken apart for an oral slide presentation. UCLA has Undergraduate Research Month in which students do poster, oral, and performing art presentations throughout the month. More and more students invite their families to their presentations. Some institutions have a rolling buffet to serve students and their families.

Economic development potential of undergraduate research initiatives, which can be pitched as workforce development initiatives. There was a consensus that employers seek graduates who have had hands-on experience, rather than having only acquired textbook knowledge. Not only does participation in research give students this type of direct experience, but symposia provide opportunities for the employers to meet these students and recruit them to their organizations. In order to make this apparent, we need to frame undergraduate research initiatives as a value proposition. A key to this approach will be establishing consistent and substantive assessment metrics.

Recommendations:

For Individual Campuses

  • Undergraduate research initiatives should be couched in terms of value rather than cost when soliciting support and building external partnerships. These initiatives have great potential to contribute to economic and community development. This case should be made broadly. Industry is eager to assist in developing their next generation of talented employees, as are state and local government agencies and branches.
  • Partnerships within a system of universities, among ‘sister’ institutions, or simply among divisions in a single institution can be an invaluable way to leverage scarce resources and pool efforts. Frequent and open communication is key to successfully overcoming barriers and potential ‘turf wars.’ Collaborations with community colleges can also be effective and help bridge to four-year institutions via undergraduate research and creative projects that occur during the summer.
  • In searching for grants and sponsors to support events such as research and creativity symposia, many small dollar requests work better than submitting a few large requests. Negotiate bargains for recurring costs such as printing, catering, building rentals, hotel accommodation, etc. Also try to obtain some sponsorship interest on the part of these providers, as reduced cost for services or outright funding.

For The Reinvention Center

  • Assessment is essential to making the case for growing and sustaining undergraduate research activities. It should be our priority to establish common metrics and to generate and share data for assessment purposes. The Reinvention Center can help with this.

References/Resources:

Websites

  1. North Carolina Undergraduate Research Consortium: http://www.northcarolina.edu/content.php/aa/departments/research/initiatives/urc.htm
  2. SNCURCS: http://www.ncsu.edu/sncurcs