| Presentation:
Multi-campus
partnerships offer the possibility of increasing the quality and
quantity of research experiences that an institution can offer its
undergraduate students. They also provide a mechanism for invigorating
and energizing faculty members, particularly those from departments
that are small or lack a research-friendly environment. Using the
Research Site for Educators at the University of Minnesota (MN RSEC;
www.chem.umn.edu/rsec)
as a starting point, this session examined goals and strategies
in setting up multi-campus partnerships between a research university
and institutions whose primary mission is undergraduate education.
The two session leaders are both involved in the MN RSEC, which
is designed to bring together faculty from undergraduate institutions
(i.e. community colleges, baccalaureate colleges, and universities
that offer master’s degrees) and faculty from research universities
to enhance the research and educational opportunities in chemistry
at both the undergraduate and research universities. Dr. Robin Tanke
is a professor of chemistry at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens
Point, a small comprehensive university with an average of fifteen
chemistry majors, and Dr. Jeffrey Roberts is a professor of chemistry
at the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities, a large research
university. Funded by the National Science Foundation, the MN RSEC
involves approximately 35 undergraduate colleges. The University
of Minnesota benefits from the partnerships by enriching the schools’
undergraduate education in chemistry and attracting their students
to Minnesota’s graduate program. The other participating institutions
benefit by gaining funds and other resources, by having access to
experiences that are not available on their own campuses, and by
getting important advice.
The session
leaders posed four questions for the group to discuss:
- What are
the advantages and disadvantages of building multi-campus partnerships?
What specific benefits do undergraduates gain? In deciding whether
to partner with another institution, when do you say “yes”
and when do you say “no”?
- How do
you ensure partner equity, especially when a broad range of institutional
types are involved? How do you accommodate widely varying needs,
capabilities, and resources?
- How do you
design a partnership for permanence? What are the best strategies
to employ to avoid making success dependent on the leadership
of one or two people? How are new leaders best recruited?
- What are
the most significant hurdles to building new partnerships? How
do you convince administrators and colleagues to see value in
a multi-campus partnership that provides modest financial benefits
to any one institution?
Discussion:
Participants
had three main interests in wanting to learn about multi-campus
partnerships: To learn how to overcome problems and establish real
partnerships with area schools (including K-12 schools), to develop
successful NSF undergraduate research centers, and to form successful
relationships with the larger community. In all three instances,
establishing productive partnerships requires first, identifying
the goals driving the alliances and then devising strategies for
initiating and sustaining them so that they retain their effectiveness
and vitality.
Partnerships provide a useful way to bring together resources from
a variety of sources to solve specific problems and to build community-wide
relationships. Benefits from such partnerships can be plentiful,
but the road to success is often filled with challenges. The first
challenge is often how to initiate a successful partnership. Several
conditions must be present:
- Successful
partnerships must begin with good relationships among the prospective
partners. These relationships allow for the growth of trust, respect,
and knowledge of each other’s programs. Often, these relationships
begin before any formal partnership exists. Through these relationships,
program needs and individual strengths can be accessed. All sides
can see how they can benefit themselves and their partners by
formalizing a partnership.
- Once the
decision is made to form a partnership, the specific goals of
all the partnership must be articulated and presented to the group
so that from the outset there is an openness to the process. This
openness facilitates trust among the various partners, as well
as a sense of ownership.
- A plan of
accountability and flexibility, are essential.
A major
challenge in developing successful partnerships relates to funding.
While funding is needed to sustain and govern successful partnerships,
it is only part of a partnership. A partnership must have a deeper
reason than funding to exist if its programs are to endure. In
addition, funding is often provided by agencies that have specific
goals that may or may not match all the goals of the partnership.
It becomes important to keep all partnership goals in mind when
working with a funding agency. When searching for funding for
a specific partnership initiative, sustainability needs to be
addressed. One must ask, “are we looking for an enduring
program or enduring effects of a program?” At the outset,
the partners must determine whether the ultimate goal is to establish
a long standing program or to produce effects which will improve
all of the partners.
Institutions
face many barriers as they attempt to form effective partnerships.
One challenge is to convince colleagues to become involved. Often,
faculty and administration do not see the benefits they would
derive from the association, nor do they feel that the benefits
are worth the time they would be expected to commit to the project.
It was suggested that skeptical faculty members and administrators
be invited to join the partnership once evidence of success can
be demonstrated. “Converts” often become the biggest
advocates of partnership programs. A second barrier is funding,
particular after the initial grant that has supported the development
of the partnership runs out. A third, more persistent challenge
is establishing equity among the partners. Despite their different
needs, capabilities, and resources, all partners must have a sense
of ownership of the program and contribute equally, though the
nature of their contributions may vary. In order to succeed, a
partnership must find ways to ensure equity. There is no precise
formula for this. Every partnership is likely to find its own
way of balancing interests.
The session concluded with participants talking about the lessons
they learned as they attempted to establish successful partnerships:
- Partnership
members must be willing to travel to other partner institutions.
- Faculty
and administrators at a research institution must be sure that
programs offered by the partnership are sensitive to the different
needs of all the partners and include an educational process through
which other partners learn about such matters as obtaining external
funds, writing grants, and becoming involved with collaborative
projects.
- Many colleagues
will become involved in a partnership program after the partnership
is established and successful. Regardless of their level of involvement,
they will most likely expect the faculty member or administrator
who initiated the partnership on their campus to solve all of
the program’s problems.
- Although
everyone may agree on program/partnership goals, the bottom line
for participating members may differ. In a partnership made up
of research universities, K-12 schools, and science museums, for
example, specific program goals were set at the start of the project.
When the members however started to initiate activities to achieve
the goals, it became apparent that they had different interests.
The researchers were concerned that the program be accurate and
impart factual information. The K-12 educators had to follow educational
standards, and the museums were eager to get more people through
the door. Once these differences were identified, it took time
and a concerted effort by numerous parties to address them. Moreover,
some of partners ultimately dropped out of the partnership.
- Equity
is key to a successful partnership. All partners must see the
benefits of involvement and must be involved 100%.
- A core of
committed people is needed for every successful partnership, though
the make-up of this core may differ widely.
- Accountability
and flexibility allow for success.
Recommendations:
For Individual
Campuses
Session participants
identified five requirements of successful partnerships:
- They must
be organic and all partners must be equal.
- They must
bring the strengths of all the partners together.
- Partnerships
should be structured around needs, not funding. They should
formalize and expand existing relationships.
- A partnership
is only worthwhile if it becomes greater than the sum of the
parts.
- An enduring
effect of a program is not the same as an enduring program.”
(Dr. Stephen May). At the outset, partners must determine whether
the ultimate goal is to establish a long-standing program or
to produce effects that will improve all of the partners. These
ultimate goals will affect funding and program/partnership goals.
For
The Reinvention Center
- The Reinvention
Center should compile an inventory of resources that provide
models of good partnerships and partnership formation. These
resources should describe successes and failures encountered
while establishing partnerships.
Resources/References
Websites
- The Research
Site for Educators at the University of Minnesota is a National
Science Foundation-funded initiative that fosters scientific interactions
between a large, Ph.D.-granting chemistry department and the departments
of 30-35 primarily undergraduate institutions. www.chem.umn.edu/rsec
- The University
of Colorado-based Coleman Institute for Cognitive Disabilities
uses interdisciplinary research and multi-campus partnerships
in the research and development of innovative technologies to
enhance the lives of people with cognitive disabilities. http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/cue01/projects/coleman2.html
and www.cu.edu/ColemanInstitute/
- The National
Science Foundation Undergraduate Research Centers (URC) Summary
of Program Requirements NSF 05-539 replaces NSF 03-595. The requirements
can be found at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsf05539/nsf05539.htm
|